Search Results

The significant data to which CM is applied includes scientific and engineering data; data that drives mission success; data that ensures IT security; and data used to make technical, programmatic, and business decisions. ...The significant data to which CM is applied includes scientific and engineering data; data that drives mission success; data that ensures IT security; and data used to make technical, programmatic, and business decisions. ...CM is about the truth, trust, and traceability of products, data used to produce products, and processes throughout their life cycle and should be applied across the Enterprise at the process and product level.

., time-boxed work periods), multiple increments producing Minimum Viable Products (MVP) and synchronized with Model Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) while being digitally transformed? MBSE initiatives drive the jump from “2D” data to “3D” data, thereby becoming a Model-Centric practice. ...The purposeful integration of existing and emerging technologies into CM practice will enable collaboration with supporting systems and provide stakeholders access to authoritative and trusted data in a timely fashion at their desktop to help drive educated decision making. This lays to rest the misguided myth that CM and supporting systems operate at cross-purposes.

This SAE Aerospace Standard (AS) establishes general requirements and descriptions of specific activities for the performance of LORA during the life cycle of products or equipment. When these requirements and activities are performed in a logical and iterative nature, they constitute the LORA process.

This SAE Standard establishes practices to: Manage risk and ensure security of a cyber-physical system (CPS) throughout its life cycle by utilizing systems engineering principles; Assess the impact of cyber-physical systems security (CPSS) objectives and requirements; Assess the security risks to CPS technical effectiveness and functions, and address weaknesses and vulnerabilities; Address various domains of consideration (see 3.1) that take into account operating conditions of the system, command and control, configuration management (refer to SAE EIA649), etc., that could negatively impact CPSS or CPS designed purpose; Perform design validation and verification to assess security and risk of the CPS.

This SAE Standard establishes practices to: a Manage risk and ensure security of a cyber-physical system (CPS) throughout its life cycle by utilizing systems engineering principles; b Assess the impact of cyber-physical systems security (CPSS) objectives and requirements; c Assess the security risks to CPS technical effectiveness and functions, and address weaknesses and vulnerabilities; d Address various domains of consideration (see 3.1) that take into account operating conditions of the system, command and control, configuration management (refer to SAE EIA649), etc., that could negatively impact CPSS or CPS-designed purpose; e Perform design validation and verification to assess security and risk of the CPS.

All SMC Product Data Standards and related documents

The library also includes the government-owned Autonomous Ground Vehicle Reference Architecture (AGVRA) Data Model Framework Version 3.1A.

According to SAE6906, Force Protection and Survivability (FPS) is the HSI domain that facilitates system operation and personnel safety during and after exposure to hostile situations or environments. Force protection refers to all preventive measures taken to mitigate hostile actions against Department of Defense and DHS (e.g., United States Coast Guard, Customs and Border Patrol, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, etc.) personnel. Survivability denotes the capability of the system and/or personnel manning the system to avoid or withstand manmade hostile environments without suffering an abortive impairment of his/her ability to accomplish its designated mission. Damage due to enemy or fratricidal action, or even equipment failure, will endanger the warfighters' well-being and place them into a life-threatening situation.

Requirements for design and quality control and the methods for communicating design and change data between electronics manufacturers (EM) and seat suppliers are defined such that standardization is possible across the industry to ensure continued airworthiness of TSO-approved seats with integrated electronic components. ...Appendix B: Provides an outline of a typical data approval process and the change management process between electronics manufactures and seat suppliers.

Identifying, coordinating, tracking, prioritizing, and resolving Habitability risks and issues and ensuring that they are: ○ Reflected in the contractor proposal, budgets, and plans ○ Raised at design, management, and program reviews ○ Debated in Working Group meetings ○ Coordinated with Training, Logistics, and the other HSI disciplines ○ Included appropriately in documentation and deliverable data items Ensuring that Habitability requirements are applied to all personnel environments, including operators, maintainers, trainers, and support personnnel. ...., workload analysis) and other HSI domain analyses to provide evidence to support design decisions and trade-offs and to coordinate shared data. Ensuring that Habitability analyses, results and recommendations are timely, technically competent/complete, and included in design decisions, tradeoffs, and changes.

The purpose of this Standard is to support the development and improvement of systems engineering capability.

The purpose of this Standard is to provide an integrated set of fundamental processes to aid a developer in the engineering or reengineering of a system. Use of this Standard is intended to help developers a) establish and evolve a complete and consistent set of requirements that will enable delivery of feasible and cost-effective system solutions; b) satisfy requirements within cost, schedule, and risk constraints; c) provide a system, or any portion of a system, that satisfies stakeholders over the life of the products that make up the system.

Systems made up of hardware, software, firmware, personnel, facilities, data, materials, services, techniques, or processes (or combinations thereof); d. A new system or a legacy system, or portions thereof.

The Handbook is organized into four sections: Data Modeling Guidelines, Data Model Usage Guide, Integration Procedure, and Schema Tailoring Guidelines ...The purpose of this handbook is to provide the data modeler with the modeling conventions, philosophy and guidelines used during development of the GEIA-STD-927 schema; and the integration process used to integrate existing best-in-class standard data models into the GEIA-STD-927 schema. ...The purpose of this handbook is to provide the data modeler with the modeling conventions, philosophy and guidelines used during development of the GEIA-STD-927 schema; and the integration process used to integrate existing best-in-class standard data models into the GEIA-STD-927 schema. Most importantly, the handbook provides tailoring guidelines for the data modeler to use in applying the GEIA-STD-927 schema and mapping tables to a practical application for an existing program.

. ○ Included appropriately in documentation and deliverable data items. Identifying and pursuing opportunities to reduce Manpower and Personnel demands and costs. ...., workload analysis) and other HSI domain analyses to provide evidence to support design decisions and trade-offs and to coordinate shared data (e.g., task analyses). Ensuring that M&P analyses and results are timely, technically competent/complete, and in a format that enables them to be included in design decisions, tradeoffs, and changes.

This document is the Architecture Description (AD) for the SAE Unmanned Systems (UxS) Control Segment (UCS) Architecture Library Revision A or, simply, the UCS Architecture. The architecture is expressed by a library of SAE publications as referenced herein. The other publications in the UCS Architecture Library Revision A are: AS6513A, AS6518A, AS6522A, and AS6969A.

GEIA-STD-927 specifies the data concepts to be exchanged to share product information pertaining to a complex system from the viewpoints of multiple disciplines. ...It supports the exchange of data across the entire life cycle for the product from the concept stage through disposal.

The primary purpose of this document is to provide roles, responsibilities and accountabilities to meet AC 21-49 Section 7.b ‘Type Certification using TSO-approved seat with electronic components defined in TSO design’. This document may be applied to all applicable seat TSOs (C39(), C127()…etc). The approval for the integration of the electronics will fall, in part or in full, under the type design authority of the Seat Installer rather than the Seat Supplier shipping the integrated seat. The defined responsibilities, areas of authority and accountability of each party, as well as necessary communication protocols, must ensure configuration management, design control and quality control. These definitions, controls and protocols are agreed (thru normal commerical agreements and binding contracts) and adhered to by all parties ensuring all parts in the supply chain remain approved (e.g. certified and conformed).